Français
  • North Pole could be ice free in 2008


    Added on Friday 25 April 2008 12:31:03
    by newscientistvideo
    54484 Views
    3.6 / 5
    12345
    104 rates
    Send this video to your friends
    Get embed code of video

    Read more: http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn13779-north-pole-could-be-ice-free-in-2008.html?DCMP=ILC-hmts&nsref=news1_head_dn13779

    Watch a series of satellite images taken from October 1, 2007 to mid-March 2008 showing changes in Arctic ice.



    facebook
    Comment(s)
  • Write your comment here...
  • gramosjr7

    What happens when you die? Have you told lies, stolen, used God's name in vain(10 Commandments)? If yes, then you're a liar, thief, and a blasphemer in the sight of God. When you die & be judged by God, you'll be guilty of sin, & go to Hell! But God sent His Son Jesus to shed His blood & die on a cross for your sins, He was buried & rose again from the dead on the third day. If you'll believe the Gospel(Jesus died for your sins,was buried & resurrected)you'll not perish & have eternal life
    Wednesday 19 October 2011 00:52:20
  • nuzod

    Next up we have the 2012 end of the world...
    Sunday 16 October 2011 08:42:44
  • rolex2136

    BUT IT AINT
    Tuesday 23 August 2011 07:35:51
  • YourMomsMomsGrandma

    2011 still kicking it!
    Sunday 21 August 2011 13:38:08
  • bigdaddysdigs1966

    his just shows that even the people that think they are the smartest in the world have no clue what mother nature will do they just keep saying things to keep their jobs at forcasting. wouldn't we all like to keep our jobs ad be wrong all the time
    Wednesday 03 August 2011 15:06:24
  • sixtyforce64

    @EnvyMy75 lol i just realized that
    Sunday 31 July 2011 14:47:30
  • EnvyMy75

    this video was posted IN 2008!
    Tuesday 19 July 2011 19:05:04
  • theevilxdocter

    oh god were all doomed the ice is gonna melt backwards in time
    Friday 15 July 2011 18:30:55
  • bomerman104

    2011 and still here and it will soon 2012 and ill still be here
    Thursday 30 June 2011 12:50:23
  • MEGAJASONGUY08

    It's 2011 now and there's still ice in the north pole : /
    Wednesday 15 June 2011 15:07:15
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense ht tp ://redwhitebluenews.co m/?p=7670
    Wednesday 25 May 2011 21:38:01
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense Clouds have to form on particulate matter and I agree there are other questions but you guys want to say you have the one and only answer which has proven to be one very small exclusive theory. Your science is a one track train that neither explains the observations or is willing to include other explanations and that is not science . The world has far too many more important problems to be concerned with than to waste time on flat earth theories. Good Luck.
    Friday 29 April 2011 15:09:27
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace omg. okay. I watched the video. Dodgy charts, unpublished nonsense. I have a question for you. How does the cosmic dust not burn up when entering our atmosphere to form the nuclei of clouds? I reckon that might be a monumental oversight in his theory. Well, this is going nowhere. I'd keep providing science and you'd keep providing pseudoscience in a neverending waste of each other's time. Have a good life.
    Friday 29 April 2011 10:05:24
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense To say that man made co2 which is a tiny percentage of co2 which is a tiny percentage of the atmosphere is responsible for climate is a huge exaggeration. Much larger forces are in play for example watch?v=F-lrgidVZLw .
    Friday 29 April 2011 09:40:56
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace cont.... I would say however that the 'debate' is choking under the weight of denial propaganda exaggerating the effect of the sun in observed warming today.
    Friday 29 April 2011 03:27:46
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace Actually they do talk about Milankovitch cycles. watch?v=hWJeqgG3Tl8 As for the sun burping, the charged particles would have an effect on electronics, but those same particles are not radiation. I would agree that there is propaganda denying the sun has any effect but its not coming from the published science. In fact, nearly every paper I have read acknowledges the fact that the Sun does control climate however, they all also point out that it is not responsible for current changes..
    Friday 29 April 2011 03:25:38
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense You got to be kidding me, three propaganda videos from the same source calling any one who disagrees "deniers" , well count me in. Those fools never talk about the influence of the solar cycles, the true source of global warming / cooling. Real scientists are more concerned with solar flares on our electronic society than MMGW. If our Sun burps in the wrong direction we can kiss our electronics good by and yet there is plenty of propaganda denying the sun has any effect.
    Thursday 28 April 2011 20:31:09
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace watch?v=-wbzK4v7GsM, watch?v=mqMunulJU7w, watch?v=yDTUuckNHgc&feature=related. These three videos will set you straight in terms of some of thesimplistic arguments youjust made about winter temperatures and the "climate change-global warming" nonsense.. i've also included the other link you claim to have not seen.
    Thursday 28 April 2011 02:58:23
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense I see your into the greenie movement. The ultimate solar energy is oil, natural gas and coal. If your looking for a real solution for real energy for the future I suggest you look at thorium fluoride reactors.
    Wednesday 27 April 2011 12:54:45
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense I did not see your link but I know its not warming because they changed the name to "climate change" which is bs. There are record cold temps around the world this last winter. The idocracy dummies elected President Camacho, who is killing the economic engine with regulations / taxes that send business out of this country. I object to all the welfare and social programs that are creating lazy parasites. I agree, if we fought war to win we would save a lot of money.
    Wednesday 27 April 2011 10:37:55
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace I see. First did you watch the link? Second, what about theclimate scientists in Australia, Great Brittain, Russia, New Zealand, China, Japan, Germany etc etc etc etc who aren't dependent on research money? I do agree with your final comment that the US is on track to becoming an idiocracy but it hasn't got anything to do with climate policy. Perhaps if your country spent a bit less on war mongering you're debt mightn't be so high.
    Wednesday 27 April 2011 02:37:32
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense Once again let me point out the sky is not falling and that was the first of many links that point this out. The US is drowning in 14 Trillion dollars of debt and yet we are still wasting money on phony research dependent on research money, can you say conflict of interest? 14 T is about $450,000.00 per household and growing every day. At the present rate the "evil" rich are all leaving and our country is hell bent on becoming a 3rd world country. Idiocracy
    Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:04:26
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace cont... closely. Despite not being able to accurately verify the sources, the graphs are deceptive in that they appear to be from cherry-picked data and aren't representative of the long term trends. The fact that they aren't properly referenced is a concern. I wouldn't take them seriously if they were on a non-dodgy site like Watt's. I have a link for you to check out. It is a youtube video. watch?v=-wbzK4v7GsM
    Monday 25 April 2011 23:59:49
  • uknowispeaksense

    @1965ace you see now that didn't hurt did it? Now, you do realise that the website you have provided is a blogsite founded by Anthony Watts. This guy is supposedly a meteorologist however he has no qualifications and no accreditation with the American Meteorological Society. He has spoken at seminars organised by the Heartland Institute an oil-funded thinktank run by three men from a shed in a paddock in the backblocks of Oregon. Despite all of this, I went to your link and examined it very...
    Monday 25 April 2011 23:42:55
  • 1965ace

    @uknowispeaksense h ttp: //wat tsupwiththat.c om/2010/05/29/arctic-ice-volume-has-increased-25-since-may-2008/ . This is how frustrating you people no matter how wrong you are you always go back to your flawed data and conclusions. The real question is were the predictions right ? The answer is absolutely not !
    Monday 25 April 2011 11:12:14
ADVERTISEMENT
Supplements
Social Network
Tag cloud
Go to top
Copyright © 2010 Prise1