I do own both the Nikon D3x and the Canon 1Ds Mark 3. Check-out my flickr account. In the real world of photography, forget the DXO charts; there is no visual difference between the 2 cameras when viewing the images at 100% crop. In fact, several stock-photography studios own analysis favored the Canon for slightly sharper and cleaner images especially above 800 ISO. However, it's rarely ever about the gear, it all comes down to the individual behind the viewfinder.
if its image quality you are all arguing about, check out DxO ratings. it is an unbaised rating of camera sensors. nikon d3x wins hands down. also nikon has a 1992 ISO rating while the canon has 1663. not to mention ergomonics, focusing system, lcd resolution, and not to mention the obvious 3.4 MP difference in resolution. there are a few canons which have a superior image quality to nikon and vice versa. in this case, nikon owns canon by a decent margin.
Nikon = greatness canon =b*tch>s
Lol just playing it all depends on what you start out with. If you like canon and invested cash in glass you need to stick with canon same with nikon. Stop being a fan boy and take pics.
@GoPlayer1248 fuck hasselblad. I can't afford to waste that kind of money on a camera... I could buy 1 right now but I'd rather buy a used porsche... or just hold on to my $
@rsevx fuck you. nikon are much suckier just like you suck your mom's tits you nikoners fucking retarded bitch. you should say sony sucks bcuz it perform much worst than canon.
I have to disagree. I don't think the 18-105mm is a horrible lens whatsoever. It's a great walk around and works with a lot of occasions. Sure I wouldn't use it for a shoot but it gets the job done in a lot of situations.
Giant! the only giant nikon has is their ego now canon 1d mark iv will woop their ass once and for all. 12 megapixel pathetic, d3s could have done it better but sadly not, say 16 mp anyone?
Français
