Français
  • NASA | HD Lunar Flyover of the First Images from the LRO Camera


    Added on Tuesday 07 July 2009 14:09:29
    by NASAexplorer
    102360 Views
    4.7 / 5
    12345
    317 rates
    Send this video to your friends
    Get embed code of video

    Want more? Check out YouTube channel "Return2Moon09" for the most up to date flyovers from the LRO Camera!

    Subscribe to NASA on iTunes!
    http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=283424434

    Or get tweeted by NASA:
    http://twitter.com/NASAGoddard

    A starkly beautiful region a few kilometers east of Hell E crater, which is located on the floor of the ancient Imbrian-aged Deslandres impact structure in the lunar highlands south of Mare Nubium. Numerous small, secondary craters can be identified, including several small crater chains. Also identifiable are distinctive lineations made readily apparent by the extreme lighting, representing ejecta from a nearby impact. The NAC image shown here has not been calibrated and the pixel values were stretched to enhance contrast. The full image width is 3.5 kilometers making features discernable down to a few meters in size.

    Download this video from:
    http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/goto?10447

    See original image info and caption at: http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse/view/nacl000000fd

    Credit: NASA/GSFC/ASU



    facebook
    Comment(s)
  • Write your comment here...
  • thor25

    Lunar hoaxers remind me not to be so harsh of the 9/11 truthers, you guys really help remind us to not hate the 9/11 truthers so much since we still have you nutcases around.
    Tuesday 06 September 2011 12:34:36
  • forestinfullbloom

    Feb 2006 : Space.com "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags." Aug 2009 :Space.com "At first glance, the image from LROC appears to depict a stark lunar surface devoid of any evidence that humans were there... ROFL LOL
    Wednesday 26 January 2011 07:42:53
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 >THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION Prove it. >THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON They sent robots,some of them returned rock samples. They had the technology to drive robots on the Moon and track them,of course. That you spend so many characters in nonsensical insults instead of arguments speaks volumes of you. I see why you can't understand the evidence and prefer a crappy conspiranoid tale, that requires a lot less thinking, if any.
    Tuesday 09 November 2010 12:11:26
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 I visited your source. It's a joke. Close up:sure the LEM looks weak. Even I agree on that. But without proper sampling of material and engineering discussion (it's engineering,not aesthetic design), the points have no merit. -Adhesive tape:prove its adhesive tape and not something else (like marks to check for misalignments). -Buzz pics:obvious different camera exposure settings. -Shadows:from the first pic it's obvious the twin rocks are far away, so the alignment is only apparent.
    Tuesday 09 November 2010 12:01:20
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 > THIS was SUPPOSED to be an up-close look at the apollo remnants. And it was, *at the available resolution*. And you can see the modules and even the tracks leaved by the moon rover. >IT FAILED. *facepalm* > And the long awaited Kaguya SHOWED NOTHING ALSO Because the resolution of its cameras is at most 10 meters. Too large, so you *wouldn't* expect it to resolve the modules. A moronic tech un-savvy point for you. >we never went to any moon *You* didn't.
    Tuesday 09 November 2010 11:57:47
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 > ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read Not when you consider all the people who they should keep in silence, plus producing all the rest of the "evidence" so the mission could be tracked even by amateurs, and the TV signal received from Australia. And the Galileo experiment in a vacuum. And the movement in lower gravity of astronauts and moon dust, that _cannot_ be replicated by simply changing the frame speed.
    Tuesday 09 November 2010 11:51:47
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 >PROVE THE PICTURES WERN'T FAKED. It doesn't work that way. You claim they are fake, you have the burden of proof. The rest is a non-argument, since it results in a non-sequitur fallacy.
    Tuesday 09 November 2010 11:48:30
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one. YOU MORONIC FUCKTARD-THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION ASSHOLE. THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON SHITHEAD. THEY HAD TO ASK ENGLAND TO DO IT FOR THEM YOU FUCKTARD LOSER. WE never went to any moon LIAR. you are a fucking robot asswipe.and a parrot & a sheep boy loser. take your cr & shove it bitchboy who can't put simple websites up
    Sunday 07 November 2010 23:27:30
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 > Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser. And you didn't spot the OBVIOUS CR character, so at best we call it a moronic draw. > YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING You have dismissed the images with no actual argument. Typical of hoaxers. And you still have to address the list of evidence from third parties around the world, including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 23:13:54
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots aulis . com is a simple way to explain it to a simpleton- just skip a space moron. aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html MORON BTW THAT is supposed to be the LEM ON THE MOON-LOL All cardboard & duct tape. NASA PHOTOS GENIUS. lol loser
    Sunday 07 November 2010 18:11:18
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots I can anticipate that if they sent a probe to take close pictures THIS was SUPPOSED to be an up-close look at the apollo remnants. IT FAILED. LOL And the long awaited Kaguya SHOWED NOTHING ALSO.DUUH,kinda like there was NOTHING to show.lol we never went to any moon moron
    Sunday 07 November 2010 18:08:30
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots Prove those pictures were faked. You are so sure-PROVE THE PICTURES WERN'T FAKED. After all the NASA-NAZI'S FROM OPERATION PAPERCLIP had so much to cover up & succeed-THEIR LIVES WERE IN THE BALANCE. sieg heil mon apollo-nut.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 18:06:29
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see... LOL FUCK YOU ASSHOLE all you have to do BRAIN DEAD is skip a space between the dot and the com asswipe. Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser. YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING. lol
    Sunday 07 November 2010 18:04:15
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots You're a robot all right-converted into a parrot to spew apollo bullshit. BTW do you even know how to post a reference? That page isn't even available. Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read.LOL Total bullshit.Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO would in no way in hell cost more than a real mission THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE IN 1969. LOL ALL BULLSHIT & LIES.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 18:02:08
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 > because it was an impossibility You haven't justified that. Even the Soviet Union sent robots,and there are mirrors put by the American astronauts. They have the rocks, too. > Talk about FAULTY REASONING & lies. Oh, the irony. > All you Moon-Tards put up all the same bullshit arguments,Stupidity Personified That broke my irony-meter. >I'm tired of writing this for the 200th time I can tell, you have no more arguments. >Don't waste my time with the same old bullshit lies Run! Run!
    Sunday 07 November 2010 15:01:56
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 So what do you expect? I can anticipate that if they sent a probe to take close pictures you would say they just put the necessary parts there.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 14:57:14
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 >That page isn't even available. You have to edit the link,since pasting it here put a CR character (%C2%AD) in "Apollo". You're not so tech-savvy, I can see... > Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO Explain the Galileo experiment, show us the _giant_ vacuum chamber. Well, I always get the same answers from moon-hoaxers every time they are unable to prove their point.  It' obvious that you don't have any counterargument here. Only "lol, bullshit, lol". It's so easy to make you run! :D
    Sunday 07 November 2010 14:54:48
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots If they couldn't get to the moon then the only way they could do it WAS TO, FAKE IT in a studio in which cost doesn't matter anyway because it was an impossibility. lol Talk about FAULTY REASONING & lies. All you Moon-Tards put up all the same bullshit arguments,Stupidity Personified. I'm tired of writing this for the 200th time.You apollonuts are a waste of time.Same bullshit faulty reasoning over & over&over. Don't waste my time with the same old bullshit lies.we never went
    Sunday 07 November 2010 14:34:17
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots You're a robot all right-converted into a parrot to spew apollo bullshit. BTW do you even know how to post a reference? That page isn't even available. Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read.LOL Total bullshit.Faking a moon landing IN A STUDIO would in no way in hell cost more than a real mission THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE IN 1969. LOL ALL BULLSHIT & LIES.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 14:30:40
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots Come on those photos SHOW NOTHING anyway. lol NOTHING. All bullshit just like before.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 14:25:00
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 "THEY DID. LOL" That's a positive assertion. You have the burden of proof for that now. Prove those pictures were faked.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 12:47:09
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 "LOL BULLSHIT LIES. The only time Russia finally was able to track "apollo" the last Apollo missions were suddenly CANCELLED." Then debunk every point in this lis: en. wikipedia. org/ wiki/ Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings Remember that there are references at the end of the page: Large corruption doesn't automatically invalidate the Moon landings. That's a non-sequitur fallacy. Faking the landings would be much more difficult than sending people on the Moon.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 12:45:52
  • cadu1995

    @WeAreTheRobots Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union. LOL BULLSHIT LIES. The only time Russia finally was able to track "apollo" the last Apollo missions were suddenly CANCELLED. lol we never went to the moon. but if u can't see that this country is the most CORRUPT-WAR MONGERS in history then i give up. It's in your face every day in washington.LIARS-THIEVES-CROOKS-MURDERERS-SCOUNDRELS.
    Sunday 07 November 2010 10:08:56
  • WeAreTheRobots

    @cadu1995 Moving the goalpost much? Here you have the details: blogs. discovermagazine. com/ badastronomy/ 2009/ 07/ 17/ apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/ That they haven't sent more people is only because it's expensive, and they did it several times already. Anyway, the mission was tracked by radar and optical telescopes all around the world, including in the Soviet Union. They could have called BS easily. The TV signal from the Moon was also registered in Australia.
    Saturday 06 November 2010 20:41:36
  • cadu1995

    @bwd81977 Dont you think they would have at least faked some photos from the LRO? Why didnt they? THEY DID. LOL
    Saturday 06 November 2010 13:51:23
ADVERTISEMENT
Supplements
Social Network
Tag cloud
Go to top
Copyright © 2010 Prise1