Français
  • How The Universe Was Formed


    Added on Sunday 27 September 2009 02:58:41
    by tdarnell
    69915 Views
    4.8 / 5
    12345
    673 rates
    Send this video to your friends
    Get embed code of video

    About a half a million years after the big bang, the cosmos began to cool, as it cooled, the hot subatomic particles that constituted the early universe began to slow down and stop colliding with each other long enough so that protons, neutrons and electrons could form. The universe cooled further and the hot particles slowed further still allowing these particles to stay together long enough to create atoms.

    The universe was nothing but a cloud of hydrogen and helium. Slowly, the universe continued to cool and structure begins to present itself within this universal cloud. From small disturbances woven into spacetime the galaxies begin to collect, tiny variations in the primordial universe became the web that collected galaxies and gave the cosmos its form.

    These galaxies become distributed along these structures, dancing within their gravitational fields, forming giant tendrils reaching out across the span of eternity.

    Until just a few short decades ago, astronomers thought the universe was static and unchanging, we didn't even know there were other galaxies until the 20th century. The heavens was a place of constancy and uniformity, the stars and planets were always there and they always would be - steady and unchanging. Instead we have learned that the cosmos is a seething cauldron of activity, as alive and vibrant as any one of us.

    Stars are born, shine and explode; stellar winds blow huge storms of gas across interstellar space; black holes devour all they touch; galaxies collide with each other, spraying stars into eternity.

    And spacetime itself grows larger by the minute.

    The universe is far from a static place. As giant stars explode after living out their lives, they stream out the elements of life, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, iron, all the necessary components for planets to form and for life to begin. We are more connected to the universe than we know, the stars are our ascendants (forefathers), we are their progeny.



    facebook
  • Write your comment here...
  • adrion13

    one word people need to contemplate... size.
    Thursday 09 February 2012 22:33:28
  • ThaWalrus2

    @CrazynCrawford8 Obviously...
    Wednesday 08 February 2012 20:12:24
  • CrazynCrawford8

    @ThaWalrus2 yes he did u must be athiest
    Wednesday 08 February 2012 18:27:47
  • ThaWalrus2

    @4EverCanela Yes, that's what the book says that was written thousands of years ago by the Romans. Is it right? No.
    Sunday 05 February 2012 15:37:07
  • 4EverCanela

    @tara6692 There is proof God is real... Search Whirlpool Galaxy Images. And when I was 4 I had a dream, I opened a closet, and an angel was speaking to me
    Sunday 05 February 2012 14:50:07
  • 4EverCanela

    @ThaWalrus2 Um Yes CrazynCrawford8 is right
    Sunday 05 February 2012 14:48:12
  • 4EverCanela

    seriously?... you actually believe in the "big bang"?! *Sigh* I might as well stop arguing with people and their beliefs. But God did make the universe... I mean what could've made the big bang according to physics. God is real
    Sunday 05 February 2012 14:47:51
  • ThaWalrus2

    @CrazynCrawford8 No.
    Wednesday 01 February 2012 17:55:30
  • fragilescroll

    *sobs* beautiful...
    Tuesday 31 January 2012 21:11:40
  • CrazynCrawford8

    Genisis 1: God created the Heavens and Earth.
    Monday 23 January 2012 23:40:07
  • tara6692

    i would think that if god did create the world , and us then why aren`t we all christians for? and i doubt that there realy are 2000 plus religionsin the worlds , one would be real and all the others are made up , fake , if the greeks believed that there was a god for every elament , truth there wasn`t it was said cause they thourght , and thats what all religions are , theroys a way to explain everything
    Thursday 19 January 2012 19:13:47
  • Bredemann100

    @Expeditionwithbass then try to imagine what nothing is too... no colors or anything not even black or white nothing u can see but it's all beyond humans comprehention
    Thursday 05 January 2012 10:57:12
  • PinkyPurply

    @Expeditionwithbass Stephen Hawking stated that if before the big bang, all that exists was compressed into an almost infinitely dense point smaller than a proton. This puts us into the weird world of Quantum mechanics (which I do not understand) Apparently in Quantum mechanics it's not unusual for a sub atomic particle to just appear and then other particles sporadically disappear. It's a little stretched but that could explain it :)
    Monday 02 January 2012 05:07:39
  • zeropluszeroiszero

    @Expeditionwithbass I was thinking the same thing just now, how can something come from nothing.
    Sunday 01 January 2012 12:46:23
  • Expeditionwithbass

    Ok, if there was this "big bang" from nothing, Then what started the "big bang"? I mean, if all existence started with this so called "big bang", then something had to create the "big bang" from nothing.
    Friday 30 December 2011 08:50:33
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c Big claims nedd big evidence."what source is 100% reliable?" Well, thats a really good question. More so often the answer is none. But when you get the same answer from all over the world at diffrent ages, then the valid reson for accepting it would increase.The claim that someone captured a big fish does not need big evidence since it wont effect the worldview. Claiming someone controls your afterlife does demands very big evidence, since it have the potential of change the world.
    Thursday 29 December 2011 05:57:45
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c It is not 100% reliable, only Christians rely on that. For others it is highly questionable. And you still dont regard the same "evidence" from other religions, so why do you expect me to regard this? And why discuss evidence when you gonna throw in the "faith (beliving without evidence) card" anyway?
    Wednesday 28 December 2011 13:36:49
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c But im still not convinced he existed, and if he is proven to do so, then there must be proof he was supernatural. For a person that could preform miracles, i need thousands of firsthand eyewitness reports, not writings done hundreds of yers later (most by fans). Those aint worth anything, All religion claim to have exactly as much proofe as the one you favor, are you ready to change if you follow the wrong one? They cant all be right, but they all can be wrong!
    Wednesday 28 December 2011 05:28:34
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c I just dont see any reason for the Jesus in the bible. No "son of god". If there was one person named Jesus i dont care about, there must have been thousands of people named Jesus. Just give some hard proof to belive what is written in the bible. Other things in history we hard hard proof of, and even the "big bada-boom theory". No point in getting emotion about this, we just follow the evidence. It may all change tomorrow with new evidence. Not my fault!
    Tuesday 27 December 2011 17:08:11
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c Cornelius Tacitus is not importent enough for the early "Christians Fathers". Why should it be to us? And is not his writings done years after "Jesus" died anyway. But for some reason Tactius is often mentioned in pro Christian literature. Anyway, even if there is proof for his existance as a normal human beeing, Would that not destroy the myth around him? If we found proof he was not the "son of God". Modern Chirstianity kinda need that to survive as a religion.
    Tuesday 27 December 2011 08:38:37
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c But you still havent provided one fact, you only said Pontius Pilate was named in a non bible sourse. That still says nothing about Jesus existence. And im not denying, i just want proof before accepting it as fact. Just same as you. And Merry Christmas : )
    Sunday 25 December 2011 06:02:45
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c The point is: It doesnt matter if thousands of people in the bible existed, or thousands of places in the bible existed. The question is if Jesus (supernatural) existed. I have looked into it for years, and even if the Muslims have tons of more historical "evidence" (lots of scourses outside) then the Christians, so is there still no evidence for anything supernatural. You even had a living "God" that died this year, Sai Baba. (google him). But stil no evidence for supernatural.
    Saturday 24 December 2011 15:17:49
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c We all know there is no hstorical records of Jesus, thats why it is called a religion instead of history. And you think someone that could heal the lame and manage to return from the dead would make people all over the world write tons of paper about it. Not only the followers of a small cult. But why not share those fact with me, just one would do. If it holds agenst logic you are safe. Or is it those kind of evidence that you must "feel in your heart" or some other crap?
    Friday 23 December 2011 16:45:01
  • daarco2

    @H1N1c The Koran does also have some "facts" (what you seems to consider be facts) in it, does that mean you also belive in Allah? And the Spider-Man comic take place in a real city (NY), does that make Spider-Man real?
    Thursday 22 December 2011 16:20:18
  • TheKainMan

    @FreShHarDip Please stop asking stupid questions. You'll find your answers in any physics book.
    Tuesday 20 December 2011 17:52:31
ADVERTISEMENT
Supplements
Social Network
Tag cloud